The Theory of Evolution is a Sham (R.E.A.L.)
Evolution is a Conspiracy
There are at least two pictures floating around online of Charles Darwin signaling that he is a member of a secret society that is known for their belief that Lucifer is God.
The purpose of "The Origin of Species" was to guide society towards a mass atheist movement.
When the "Theory of Evolution" was first introduced, two of the main points were that life started from a primordial soup and that man was descended from monkey. These two ideas were then intentionally used as evidence that God must not exist.
The "primordial soup" premise was dropped from the theory of evolution and made into a separate branch of science called abiogenesis - which has made zero progress and essentially dead ended at takeoff. The idea that we evolved from monkeys has also become essentially obsolete.
The news that dinosaur fossils had been found across the globe was also used as a way to induce a mass atheist movement. Dinosaurs can be placed in the same category as gods when it comes to actual proof and evidence that they exist. Sorry paleontologists, you're the Mormons of science.
The theory of evolution has spent over a century continuously moving the goalposts. It's like trying to forcefully shove a square hole through a round peg. They have spent so much time and effort trying to make the idea of evolution real. A great example of the scientific method in use!
Evolution has been widdled down to nothing more than the fact that things adapt to their environment over time. Wow, mind is blown.
Changes in allele frequency do not suggest progress being made, but rather a back and forth reaction to environmental factors causing small changes, and then many years later changes to changes. There is nothing there to create advancement into complexity. Adaptation does not require the advancement into complexity, nor does it provide anything to be directed towards this. Evolution is a process akin to "getting something for nothing".
The guided, intelligent evolution of the wolf failed to introduce complexity, or an advancement in intellect. How was nature able to do this by sheer coincidence?
Upon discovering DNA it was declared that "it appears to be a set of instructions". Instructions denote intelligence. DNA has also been compared to "a living language" and "biological programming".
There is no evidence for common ancestry, only misinterpretations of the fossil record. The tree of life and common ancestry are not real. Similarities in DNA between species no more suggests common ancestry than it does intelligent design - these are both interpretations that require faith to believe in.
There is no evolutionary advantage to a female G-spot orgasm, or any female orgasm. There is no evolutionary advantage to a prostate orgasms.
There is no evolutionary advantage to being born so incredibly premature. Our oversized brains evolving naturally as an evolutionary advantage would require foresight and intelligence.. of course, it could've just been the result of a random mutation.
There is zero evolutionary advantage to the experience of empathy. None. Try to force an explanation anyway you would like, but nature only moves in a narcissistic direction. There is no way that empathy could have developed in the way you people believe.
What could be the evolutionary advantage for human beings to destroy their natural habitat? Are we a highly complex and intelligent parasite? There is no evolutionary mechanism available to explain human creativity.
There is zero proof that linear time is actually real. Evolution requires that linear time is real. Nothing can evolve in the eternal moment. Ok, I shouldn't have done this one. Oh well.
Vestigial organs are a misinterpretation. There is zero proof that there are vestigial organs or features.
In unrelated news quantum physics has proven that matter requires an observer in order to exist.
Contrary to popular belief, the Theory of Evolution wasn't introduced for the purpose of discrediting Christianity and organized religion, it was introduced at the great expense of this; the reason being as a preventative measure against people beginning to think of something else. Also, I suspect that it is no accident that subjective experiences cannot be qualified as "science". Perhaps this is because the only way that actual truth can be proven is through subjective experiences. One more thing - I understand that "evolution has been proven". Proven to be that - shocker - life adapts to its environment. Wow. That is what has been proven, nothing more.
Well, goodnight everyone.
Comments
Post a Comment