Subjective Morality vs. Objective Morality (R.E.A.L.)
I
In the world we live in:
Our free will is inhibited
Morality is subjective
There is suffering
Our free will is inhibited by our brain, our body and physics. It's like our consciousness has literally been imprisoned in the cells of our body. Consciousness is not an emergent property that our brains create. Our brain is inhibiting our consciousness and helping to program us into the belief systems that this world encourages. We can think freely, but our potential has been limited. One thing that I believe is that if you can imagine something, then it is possible for it to exist. If you can understand the concepts in this text, then it is possible for those concepts to truly exist.
I have arrived at the understanding that, in this world, morality is subjective. There isn't any action that we can claim is always wrong and there isn't any action that we can claim is always right. The intention behind every action must be known to determine if the action was the "morally correct" thing to do. This leads to conflict, when one individual feels that the action taken was the right thing to do, while another individual feels that the same action was the wrong thing to do. The result of this is that an authority figure is needed to resolve the conflict, and make a final determination on whether the action was right or wrong. This world is an inverted corruption of the original world we used to live in
In the world we used to live in:
Free will is uninhibited
Morality is objective
There is no suffering
This is the world that I know is out there somewhere. This world is my home and it might be your home, too. If I can understand the concepts that make this world possible, then it has the potential to truly exist. I can understand that authentic free will is uninhibited, in the form of pure conscious awareness and not bound by any laws. The true God of creation - who is not affiliated with any religion - is pure, unconditional love. The gift of the true God of creation is authentic, uninhibited free will. In what kind of world would it even be possible to experience such love and freedom? In a world where morality is objective. Objective morality is this:
The Divine Law of The True God of Creation: It is wrong to take authority over others, and it is wrong to allow others to take authority over you.
The divine law is objective morality, and it is imperative for the concept of objective morality to be understood by anyone who is interested in the following theories. Through the understanding of objective morality is the knowledge that is needed to get off the wheel of Samsara and exit the reincarnation cycle. The idea is that right after we die we are in the other world - or at least close enough to where the divine law of the true God is followed. This means that we need to allow others to take authority over us before we can be recycled back into this world again. So anyone reading this who believes that they did not choose to be here and that they are here against their will should reevaluate this, because this belief is incompatible with objective morality. If you didn't choose to be here, then how are you going to be able to escape? You have to understand that you did choose to be here, or you somehow allowed yourself to end up here.
The world where the True God of Creation resides is a world where no one takes authority over others, or allows others to take authority over them. Here morality is objective, meaning that taking authority over others is always wrong, not wrong depending on the specific circumstances each time. When no one is taking authority over others then everyone is truly free, and existing in the eternal moment. In this world there is no suffering. Do you understand why that is?
II
The reason why there is suffering is because we are in a world where it is ok to take authority over others. This is why the world is in a fallen state and this is why we are all separated from the True God of creation, because the True God literally cannot be here. This world violates the divine law.
Adam and Eve has always been my favorite story in the Bible, because I can always seem to dig into in and uncover deeper meaning. I realize now that the story is also inverted (which so many things in this world are). According to the story, the world is fallen because Adam and Eve disobeyed God and ate the forbidden fruit, when in fact the opposite is true: the world is fallen because God is taking authority over Adam and Eve, who are also allowing God to do so.
In this world the divine law is broken and it is ok to take authority over others. This is an aspect of nature, and I'm sure we all understand that this is commonplace in the animal kingdom. We live in a world where things need to eat other things to survive, where parasites find hosts to feed off of, and natural disasters decimate the land.
A great example of the corrupted paradox this world manifests, which is relevant in today's society, is abortion. Abortion is wrong, because when a woman has an abortion she is taking authority over the life of the baby, but if we were to make abortion unavailable altogether, we would be taking authority over the life of the woman. Politicized issues such as abortion are what I call "duality traps". Everyone is encouraged to pick a side in the debate and stick to their guns. The problem is that both sides are breaking the divine law which means everyone is wrong. Understand that you do not have to play into these traps and you aren't required to have an opinion on these issues. Avoid the trap by being neutral on the issue and not taking a side.
Because the nature of this planet is against divine law/objective morality, it naturally produces authoritative hierarchy systems. Authoritative hierarchy systems, such as governments, which hold authority over human populations across the world. Using the Hegelian Dialectic, governments create fear then offer protection and security in order to alleviate said fear, and humanity responds by allowing the government to have authority over them. Our current example of this is the COVID-19 pandemic, which has some folks in such a state of fear that they are currently begging the government to hold more authority over them. And I'm not sure if I could think of a better example of the divine law being inverted than in the motto of the police: "to serve and protect". "To serve" represents the police allowing us to take authority over them "and protect" represents how we allow the police to have authority over us.
From the time we are born into this corrupt and inverted world, we are relentlessly indoctrinated with dogmatic beliefs that it is ok for us to take authority over others and it is ok for others to take authority over us. We are raised under the authority of our parents, educated under the authority of our teachers and employed under the authority of our supervisors. We are taught that it is ok for members of higher social classes to take authority over the members of lower social classes who are taught that it's ok to serve others who have more money. We receive our information from the authority of experts and we are discouraged from trusting ourselves or our neighbors and instead we are encouraged to trust the authority of external sources.
Many young adults aspire to becoming an authority figure by joining the military, the criminal justice system, law enforcement or politics because they are intoxicated by the romance of helping others for "the greater good". They know the system is corrupted, but they believe that by joining the system they can help fix that corruption, somehow. Those poor fools will learn the lesson that many before them have learned: you can't fix the system from within. You can't fix the system at all when it's broken by design. Are there any Ayn Rand fans reading this? (crickets) I would recommend looking up some of her quotes about altruism, and why it isn't beneficial to society.
Doing something for the greater good can only be accomplished by taking authority over others. There is a great example of this in the movie The Dark Knight, when the joker plays a game with two ships that are full of people. Each ship has the option to push a button that will blow up the other ship and kill everyone aboard. If neither ship decides to push that button, then both ships will explode and they will all die. In a world of subjective morality this is a very suspenseful situation to be in, because nobody knows what will happen. In a world of objective morality there would be know suspense because everyone knows that both ships are going to explode. That's why it is objective morality.
We are so indoctrinated that even our beliefs about love have become inverted and opposed to the true God. If you truly love someone then you should let them be free, but here we are taught that true love is holding authority over the person we love. Cheating in a relationship is something that we are taught is wrong; a violation of the contract that was agreed upon to let your partner hold authority over you until the day you die.
I want to make sure that I am thoroughly explaining these concepts, because they are difficult to grasp, which obviously is what was intended by the creators of this world which imprisons is. The reason we are suffering is because it is wrong to take authority over others, but that doesn't mean that it is only wrong to take authority over others when it causes suffering. This inverted world has also inverted the concept of being a good person, by employing the archetype of "the hero". The hero in every story is synonymous with the good guy and protagonist, who saves the people from the villain. Often times is the case that the villain is taking authority over the damsel in distress, but it is imperative to also understand that the hero is also taking authority over the damsel in distress by saving her. When we view the situation through the eyes of objective morality we can see that it is wrong to save others. I suppose then that I shouldn't be surprised when every new movie that comes out is a garbage Marvel superhero story about how taking authority over others is the right thing to do. I knew there had to be a good reason why I hate white knighting so much... fucking simps.
III
I don't think that anybody has made me not want to be a vegan more than a Redditor who calls himself "The Vegan Skeptic". He left a long response on my last post, to which I left a long reply, and then he left a long response to that and then immediately blocked me. I'm not sure why he would restrict me from countering his pedantic blabbering like that, but in his reply he said that being vegan is the "morally superior" position to take. Only in the world that is separated from the divine do concepts exist such as being superior to others or being inferior to others. Feeling inferior to others makes it seem like it's ok to let others, who are more superior, have authority over us. Many people in this world feel like they are inferior to a superior God, whom they have been fooled into thinking is the true God. A "morally superior" position can only exist in a world where morality is subjective. Subjective morality is an illusion; an illusion that I call The Duality Game.
Vegans know that their dies also causes animals to suffer, but they believe that their position is morally superior because the animals who suffer as a result of the vegan diet are not as sentient as the animals that die as a result of the meat eaters diet, and therefore, the vegan diet reduces the suffering of animals. It is their right to believe this and normally I wouldn't have an issue with this, but it becomes an issue for me when they say it in this community. This isn't about reducing the suffering of others; this is about not taking authority over others, and the only way to accomplish this would be to stop eating entirely and survive by sun gazing.
When we eat meat we are taking authority over the animals, but not eating meat in order to save the animals is also taking authority over the animals. Owning a pet is also taking authority over animals. Are there any vegan pet owners participating in the virtue signaling that has been going on in this subreddit? How would you vegan bros like it if someone chopped off your nuts and put a leash over your head to take you outside to take a shit?
These guys are either intentionally compromising the forum or they are coming in here and being idiots who don't understand the subject matter very well. I, on the other hand, understand that veganism is concerned with ethics and saving the animals, while being plant based is only concerned with diet. Going vegan is another example of a politicized issue that compels people to take a moral stance. This is a duality trap, just like the debate around abortion. Do not play the duality game by picking a side. Instead, remain neutral and hold no opinions on the issue. Don't go vegan at all; go plant based instead, to avoid taking authority over others.
The truth is that we shouldn't eat meat. Not in order to save the animals, but because it is wrong to take authority over them. While it's ok to understand that it is wrong to eat meat, it is not ok to feel guilty about eating meat. The feeling of guilt is very dangerous and everyone should make an effort to stop feeling guilty altogether. You shouldn't feel guilty about your actions. Try to understand what it means to live in a world where it is ok to take authority over others. Remember all the ways in which you have and are currently allowing others to take authority over you. Feeling guilty about our actions is something that will be used against you. Feeling regret about your actions will be used against you. There is no reason to feel regret or to feel guilty about any of your actions. People who feel guilty want to be told that everything will be ok. People who feel guilty want to be forgiven. Forgiven by whom? Wanting to be forgiven for your actions is another form of allowing others to take authority over you, and it also promotes the idea of being inferior to others who are superior. You don't need to be forgiven for your actions. They are your actions and your actions alone. Do not let others take authority over you because of your actions.
One of my catch-phrases around here is that The way to win the duality game is by choosing not to play. This means two things:
Remaining neutral on politicized and dualistic moral issues by not picking a side or holding an opinion. This is what is meant by "taking a neutral position".
Refusing and altogether neglecting to apply a moral stance to our actions. The choices we make and the actions we take are not "right" or "wrong". They are not "good" or "evil". This is what is meant by "choosing not to play the game of duality". This is not about avoiding actions that are right or wrong by taking the "middle path" or "choosing neutrality".
I realized some time ago that there is no way for a person to get through this life, or even for a person to reach adulthood, without commiting sins or doing bad things. Later I realized that, in many cases, it wasn't even the person who responsible for the sin, but rather that nature seemed to induce sinning. Today I realize that sins are an illusion of an inverted world where divine law is broken and there is no objective morality.
Doing bad things does not make it ok for bad things to happen to you. God cannot judge you nor can a cosmic process called karma control your destiny, unless you allow this to happen. Doing so would be commiting an actual sin against the true God, who loves you and wants you to be free. This is what being sovereign is all about. You are sovereign.
Comments
Post a Comment